I find that I often feel this way when I attend workshops and receive different messages about math instruction, curriculum and assessment. It takes me some time and thought to sort it out, and I know that I am not unique in this regard. Recently, I have had conversations with teachers that highlight the pervasiveness of this feeling. Teachers perceive mixed messages about what to teach and how to teach it. The messages come from a variety of sources, and teachers feel pulled in different directions. They want focus, clarity, and communication.
To address this, Jen Miller-Arsenault, Bill Kimball and I are collaborating with the goal of unpacking and reconciling some of the conflict and to provide WCSU teachers with a consistent message about math curriculum, instruction and assessment.
We will address the mixed messages in separate posts that are linked below. For the in-service on October 13, we will spend some time "browsing" the posts. To honor your individuality, we'll use this menu differentiation strategy (that I've used with homework and practice activities in class).
Main Dishes (Read and comment on each of these posts.):
- WCSU Math Non-negotiables vs. the Common Core States' Standards
- Untangling Assessments: What are they all for?
- Math practices vs. Habits of Mind vs. Positive Math Classroom Norms
- Is it okay to use a textbook?
- Why am I attending this PD? I don't teach math.
*"PNOA" stands for Primary Number and Operations Assessment. It is an interview format assessment that was developed by a team of Vermont educators as a multipurpose tool for grades k-2.
No comments:
Post a Comment